Friday, August 28, 2009

A bad workman blames his tools

Print on demand technology is very important to small press publishing, and will only continue to be as time goes on. This is true whether it is through a service like Lulu that processes orders, or whether a small print run is ordered directly from Lightning Source or some other similar service.

There is a growing perception that Lulu in particular is a bad service or that it provides shoddy products. The fact is that after hundreds of copies of Labyrinth Lord, I've only seen reports of two copies printed poorly. That's an error rate of well under 1% folks. When RPGnow goes live with their POD service, they will likely use the same printers as Lulu. The quality of the printing is pretty damn good, and this should not be confused with the sometimes maddening customer service with Lulu, who is actually just a middle man for the printers in the first place.

There are more and more people self publishing these days, and sometimes they make mistakes in creating their files for Lulu. This is largely from inexperience, but it's also sometimes because people get into a rush to have the product out there, for a number of reasons. When such a product has a shoddy appearance, some of these people blame Lulu, saying things like the printing doesn't turn out the proper color, is too dark, etc. Some people blame the website interface.

Attention Publishers: When you shrug the responsibility off on the printer, blaming them for things you could have prevented, you are unfairly blaming the source, and therefore creating the idea that POD is crap. When you do this, you are shooting yourself in the foot, because POD technology is becoming the lifeblood of this kind of small press publishing. Do not convince customers that POD is bad, especially because it's not, but also because when you do so you are destroying a market.

The bottom line is that a service like Lulu that is self service puts the entire burden on you, the publisher, to learn the interface and learn what needs to be done to set up your cover properly or your body text file properly. There is no one to inspect quality, which means you, the publisher, need to inspect quality.

That means you need to order a proof copy before you release it to the public.

Inconvenient, yes, but if you want to be responsible, it has to be done.

If properly done, you can get high quality products from POD. There is nothing odd about the way it works, nothing inherent that will produce dark covers, or off colors, or move your text around; none of these things will happen if you do the job right and understand how things work.

I want to provide a couple of useful tips, some of which I've learned the hard way. I get such a low error rate with Labyrinth Lord because I bit the bullet and ordered proof copies. I also took the time to learn how to properly construct print-ready files.

TIPS

Covers:

1) Read the directions very carefully regarding the dimensions of your cover. If doing a one piece cover, be sure you calculate spine width correctly.

2) When setting up your trim edges, be sure to extend whatever color is on the cover all the way through the trim edges. Why? Because there will be slight variation in where they cut the cover, and if you don't have color on the whole thing you may end up with a white line on one or more edges. This is true for case wrap hard covers as well. They may or may nor fold the cover over the board in exactly the place where you think they will.

3) Work with high resolution, high quality images. You need to have images that are at least 300 dpi. Scaling them up to 300 dpi will not work, it will only result in fuzzy images, unless you are working with vector art.

4) Use the gamut warning on whatever software you are using to design your covers. The Lulu FAQ says (or at least it did last time I checked) that your cover should be designed with RGB colors. This is not true. They tell people that because it is easier for most people to do RGB. The truth is that the printer prints with CMYK even if they can read RGB. Not all RGB colors translate into CMYK, meaning that when it is converted the color will shift. It could end up darker, or it could end up an "off" shade of color from what you intended. Always construct your cover in CMYK, or at least work with colors that are within the CMYK gamut.

4) Understand that computer screen resolution and brightness does not necessarily reflect what your cover will actually look like when printed. This is true no matter what print method you use. If your screen is set too light or too dark, that affects your perceptions. How many colors is your monitor set to display? It doesn't display only in CMYK, either.

Book Body

The biggest tip here is to be sure you have created a print ready PDF with high quality software. If you use Adobe products you are in very good shape. Take the time to learn how to use it. If you use other software then I'm afraid it is hit or miss, and you'll have to do some investigating to find high quality freeware PDF creators. They are out there. However, PDFs created with other software may have problems with some printers, and not necessarily consistently. Remember that some PDF software is designed for onscreen viewing of documents, not for creating high resolution print ready documents for publishing.

The bottom line is that POD technology is an incredible resource for small press publishing. Even when you order a short run for distribution, it is POD technology, and then you better get it right or your whole run is wasted. Many of us small press publishers will have some titles in distribution, and some lower volume titles only available through POD. These are our tools, our life blood. Do not create the impression that POD printing sucks just to cover mistakes. Do not give POD technology a bad name when it doesn't deserve it.

This also turns to a trust issue. Customers get tired of buying a book only to have the next "fixed" version up two days later (or even two minutes later). This is such a big problem with some publishers that I confess I won't touch anything some of them put up for POD, knowing it is going to be shoddy or the product will go through revision after revision as a result of rushing it or not constructing the files correctly. It's one thing to update a PDF only product, because that is a simple matter of downloading the update, but when you're customers waste the money on a physical product this hurts them and it hurts the image of the delivery mechanism. We all have to do a good job of making sure that when a POD title becomes available, we have taken all steps necessary to ensure a quality product. Mistakes do occur, but typos are an entirely different subject than having gross printing errors on the cover. There should never be those kind of errors in a finished product.

Respect the tools, and use them correctly to do the job right and we can continue to build the POD market. Use the the tools haphazardly and you destroy a method of distribution that is extremely important.

11 comments:

R. Lawrence Blake said...

Thanks for this post. What you said about ordering a proof copy is of the utmost importance and should never be disregarded in favor of getting a product our sooner.

I found many mistakes (one directly on the cover!) in my own proof copies and was able to fix them (the ones I found at least). The proof is worth the few extra bucks to ensure quality.

Jeff Rients said...

Well put and good advice. Thanks!

WalkerP said...

Great advice, but until there is competition (come on, RPGNow) or Lulu fixed their ridiculous shipping policies, POD is basically dead for anybody outside of the United States today. It's really a shame.

Dan of Earth said...

@WalkerP

Keep in mind RPGnow will be using the same printers. I'm not sure about shipping issues. We may or may not see an improvement with RPGnow, and part of that will depend on whether Lulu is inflating shipping so they can make a few bucks on it (even though they don't print, or ship, or package...etc.)

Ironically I think people in Canada have it worse for shipping than people in Europe, because at least for paperbacks, saddle stitch, etc. there are printers in Europe.

I get a lot of UK orders via Amazon for the paperbacks, though.

James Maliszewski said...

The quality of Lulu books is just fine in my experience. Sometimes it's very good indeed. My only beef with it is the same as WalkerP's: the ridiculous shipping costs to Canada. I've passed on buying a number of OSR products, like the last issue of Fight On! because the cost is simply prohibitive.

JimLotFP said...

I know I've gone off on Lulu in the past, but it wasn't about the quality of the finished product.

I'm pretty sure the process they use to print their books isn't much different than the local digital press I'm using these days.

My problem with Lulu is the laziness it creates in publishers (as your examples pointed out) in getting proofs, the huge per-book cost when ordering single books (and still a lot more expensive than having the work done locally), and their disregard for the authors on their site (the whole unannounced Amazon move and price hike to go with it). Not to mention shipping costs which have been hammered to death.

It creates a situation where it's difficult to sell the book anywhere but from Lulu without a huge price tag.

I can't speak about hardcovers at all, but otherwise I'm willing to bet that anyone who lives in a town of any size at all could get their work done just as well, and cheaper, locally.

Dan of Earth said...

@James

There are definitely service issues with Lulu, and not just from the customer standpoint but also from the publisher standpoint. They inflate per unit costs essentially by adding about 2 dollars or so to the binding cost. Now, IMO this is understandable because in one sense they do offer a considerable service just in taking and fulfilling orders, and processing payments. Lulu is not a good place to order bulk and resell. The best prices I've found so far for digital printing are an outfit called Publishers Graphics. I ordered the LL print run from them and will do so again. They have also started up a Lulu-like service that I want to investigate, because so far their customer service has been great and their print quality is superb. If they can serve as an online per unit print store then we will finally have about the ideal situation for those kinds of sales.

Dan of Earth said...

Oh, I forgot, also Lulu takes 15% of the sale on top of the inflated binding cost. So all that considered I'm hoping RPGnow beats that.

JB said...

Thanks for the information.

John Adams said...

Very good post, Dan.

I'm glad you have had good luck with Lulu. My biggest gripes with Lulu happen AFTER I have received a proof copy and even after a bunch of other folk have purchased a copy too. A month later I'll order a small print run of the same product only find it arrive with the last few pages missing, the cover off-center or even with lighter paper and lighter print. These are human mistakes done by the people actually creating the products and not the files they are using.

It is a good analogy overall (POD as a tool used by publishers), but there is a human factor when it comes to any POD printer - local or global.

For example, I had a local printer create the interiors for a BHP module a few months back. Instead of digitally printing every page, they digitally printed the first three copies of the module and then quickly photo-copied the rest! They thought I wouldn't notice!

Yes, use your tools correctly, but also be sure your tools don't try to cheat you either. :)

Dan of Earth said...

Wow John, that's some bad luck!